More Optimism About Future Treatments for Lung Cancer

November 24, 2009

This year’s Lung Cancer Awareness Month has ushered in a new sense of hopefulness about better treatments in the future for lung cancer. 

Continued developments in targeted therapy are leading more oncology researchers to investigate personalized treatments for lung cancer. It’s important to note that lung cancer was one of the first cancers in which targeted therapy was found to help a segment of people dealing with late-stage lung cancer. Today’s newer targeted therapies offer the promise of improved treatment outcomes for many more types of lung cancer. For more information, read CancerCare’s free publications,  A New Class of Drugs: Targeted Treatments for Cancer, Progress in the Treatment of Lung Cancer, and Your Guide to the Latest Cancer Research and Treatments (Lung Cancer).

Unfortunately, people coping with lung cancer are still saddled with a significant emotional burden arising from the stigma of the diagnosis, which can have a negative impact on the views of even the professionals themselves who treat lung cancer patients. The stigma also exacerbates emotional stress among family members of the lung cancer patient, especially when that person has a smoking history. And, patients themselves often react with guilt and shame to their lung cancer diagnosis which may interfere with their doing all they can to comply with their treatment. 

A great deal of work needs to be done to address the social stigma of lung cancer so that the diagnosis, like all other cancers, can finally be acknowledged as a “no fault” medical event for patients. Because the simple fact is, no one deserves lung cancer.

Learn more about CancerCare’s free, professional support services for lung cancer patients and their loved ones.

  • Share/Bookmark

Cervical Cancer: To Vaccinate — or Not?

September 10, 2009

A few weeks ago, I received a phone call from a 42-year-old mother in Oklahoma who had been living with cervical cancer for the past two years. Her call, however, was not about her own situation but about whether she should have her 13-year-old daughter get an HPV vaccination.

Much has been written recently about the positive impact of HPV vaccinations in preventing cervical cancer. The human papilloma virus, or HPV, is the most common sexually transmitted infection, usually occurring when a person first becomes sexually active. There are many HPV strains, which can be spread simultaneously; some are related to genital warts, others to cancers. HPV has been found to be responsible for a majority of cervical cancers and is also implicated as the cause of some oropharyngeal cancers, about half of all penile cancers, and most anal cancers. Although the body’s immune system clears up most HPV infections, about 10% remain, which can then lead to a disease state.

Yet, controversy persists about the effectiveness of HPV vaccinations as a preventive measure against cancer, particularly cervical cancer. The debate involves how the vaccine is marketed and the risk of side effects outweighing its potential to protect girls and young women from developing cancer later in life. Some critics accuse the pharmaceutical industry of creating a “market out of thin air” and question the ethics of claiming that HPV vaccines guard against cancer, as opposed to being a vaccine against a sexually transmitted disease.  The debate continues.

These were the issues weighing on the mind of my caller that day. Often, the kind of counseling an oncology social worker provides is supporting people caught in the midst of this kind of debate, weighing conflicting and sometimes contradictory information, and then helping that individual decide the best course of action to take for his or her situation. This is so true of this topic. We can help you get the information you need to make the right decision for you. Call us at 1-800-813-HOPE (4673).

[NOTE: On Sept. 9, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel of independent medical experts endorsed the use of a second vaccine -- Cevarix -- to protect against cervical cancer in women; and to expand the use of the first approved vaccine, Gardasil, in preventing genital warts in males. The panel's endorsement is expected to lead to the FDA's approval of Cevarix. Gardasil was approved in 2006. Source: The Wall Street Journal]

William Goeren, LCSW-R, is a professional oncology social worker and director of quality assurance of the social services division of CancerCare.

  • Share/Bookmark

Cancer.net Reliable Source for Cancer Information

August 5, 2009

When you’re facing a serious illness like cancer, finding out more information about your diagnosis can be confusing and frustrating –especially if you’re looking for it on the Internet. The web is full of medical information — the challenge is determining which sources you can rely on for accurate, current and trustworthy information, and which ones are out of date, not relevant or just plain wrong.

Cut through the confusion by going to http://www.cancer.net. The official website of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the world’s  foremost organization of cancer physicians, cancer.net provides easy-to-understand, up-to-date, reliable cancer information, reviewed and approved by oncology experts.

The site provides comprehensive information about diagnoses by cancer type, treatments, survivorship issues, policy and advocacy, and much more. CancerCare Executive Director Diane Blum, MSW serves as editor-in-chief of cancer.net; watch the new video on the cancer.net homepage in which she and several of the nation’s top oncologists talk about this important resource, relied on by patients and health care providers alike.

  • Share/Bookmark

Clinical Trials Need More Volunteers

August 4, 2009

Experts agree that one of the biggest barriers to advancing cancer research is the lack of volunteers who participate in clinical trials. Clinical trials, which test the safety effectiveness of new treatments and then compare them to standard treatments, are the only way advances can be made; however, only 3 percent of adult cancer patients participate.

A recent article  in the New York Times explores the reasons why clinical trial enrollment is so low and how researchers are working to change this through new methods of patient selection that would require far fewer than the usual 5,000-10,000 patients needed for each trial.

For more information on finding upcoming or ongoing clinical trials, visit www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.emergingmed.com.

  • Share/Bookmark